ASDSO Dam Safety Toolbox

Pre-Modeling Communication: Consequence Estimation Considerations: Difference between revisions

From ASDSO Dam Safety Toolbox
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "* State the software selection and describe the limitations of the program as they apply to this project. * Describe the scenarios to be modeled and any scenario-specific assumptions that will be applied. * Note the sources of information for project-specific input and model-specific parameters and describe the uncertainties or limitations of that information. Also identify data needs and how those gaps will be addressed. * Describe the anticipated model extent and...")
 
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- Default code to remove table of contents and add line break at top of page -->
__NOTOC__
<!-- Add Category to drive breadcrumb menus -->
[[Category: Model Work Plan]]
----
<noautolinks>
{{Picture
<!-- Add image file name (ex.image.jpg) -->
|image=breach1.png
<!--Add link if applicable -->
|link=
<!-- Add picture caption -->
|caption=2D hydraulic modeling can be used to simulate and estimate the consequences of dam and levee failures.
(Image Source: Gannett Fleming)
}}
Prior to performing a consequence estimation analysis, the following modeling parameters and key assumptions should be considered and addressed in a model work plan as appropriate:
* State the software selection and describe the limitations of the program as they apply to this project.  
* State the software selection and describe the limitations of the program as they apply to this project.  
* Describe the scenarios to be modeled and any scenario-specific assumptions that will be applied.  
* Describe the scenarios to be modeled and any scenario-specific assumptions that will be applied.  
Line 6: Line 23:
* Describe how warning, intervention, and evacuation will be considered as part of the analysis. Warning time and the preparedness of communities to respond to emergency conditions can have a significant impact on overall consequences of a dam failure. Also describe the methodology that will be used to evaluate flood lethality should evacuation efforts fail.
* Describe how warning, intervention, and evacuation will be considered as part of the analysis. Warning time and the preparedness of communities to respond to emergency conditions can have a significant impact on overall consequences of a dam failure. Also describe the methodology that will be used to evaluate flood lethality should evacuation efforts fail.
* If a parametric sensitivity analysis is planned, describe the approach.
* If a parametric sensitivity analysis is planned, describe the approach.
* Mention the process that will be used to model the dam breach. Will more than one method be applied and how does the modeler plan to select or screen methods to develop the breach hydrograph?  This would also likely be addressed in the parametric sensitivity analysis portion. Consider the use of stochastic simulation of breach hydrograph and resulting inundation zone and consequences.
''Development of this page was sponsored by the [[Montana | Montana Department of Natural Resources & Conservation]] with funding from the FEMA Assistance to States Grant Program.''
<!-- Revision history information -->
{{revhistinf}}
</noautolinks>

Latest revision as of 19:15, 27 August 2024


2D hydraulic modeling can be used to simulate and estimate the consequences of dam and levee failures.

(Image Source: Gannett Fleming)

Prior to performing a consequence estimation analysis, the following modeling parameters and key assumptions should be considered and addressed in a model work plan as appropriate:

  • State the software selection and describe the limitations of the program as they apply to this project.
  • Describe the scenarios to be modeled and any scenario-specific assumptions that will be applied.
  • Note the sources of information for project-specific input and model-specific parameters and describe the uncertainties or limitations of that information. Also identify data needs and how those gaps will be addressed.
  • Describe the anticipated model extent and the associated source of flood inundation depth, velocity, and timing data. The analysis should extend far enough downstream that additional incremental consequences due to dam failure are not anticipated.
  • Describe the source of population-at-risk estimates. This often consists of structure inventories that have population assigned to each structure point or footprint. Data should be recent and reflect current distribution of the population within the hazard area. If necessary, structure data should be supplemented with population estimates for major roadways, recreational areas, or other transient populations in the inundation area. Depending on the complexity of the analysis, data may need to reflect both daytime and nighttime populations or include structure type and size.
  • Describe how warning, intervention, and evacuation will be considered as part of the analysis. Warning time and the preparedness of communities to respond to emergency conditions can have a significant impact on overall consequences of a dam failure. Also describe the methodology that will be used to evaluate flood lethality should evacuation efforts fail.
  • If a parametric sensitivity analysis is planned, describe the approach.
  • Mention the process that will be used to model the dam breach. Will more than one method be applied and how does the modeler plan to select or screen methods to develop the breach hydrograph? This would also likely be addressed in the parametric sensitivity analysis portion. Consider the use of stochastic simulation of breach hydrograph and resulting inundation zone and consequences.


Development of this page was sponsored by the Montana Department of Natural Resources & Conservation with funding from the FEMA Assistance to States Grant Program.


Revision ID: 8031
Revision Date: 08/27/2024