Terrain Data: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "__NOTOC__ ---- <!-- Delete any sections that are not necessary to your topic. Add pictures/sections as needed --> [Page Summary] “The USDOI in its report Inundation Mapping/Modeling Subproject Report, Implementation Phase 1: Launch Risk Reduction, dated March 2011, recommends that as a general rule, larger dam breach flows, in terms of peak breach discharge and volume, do not require as detailed terrain data as would smaller flows. Smaller flood flow requires a more d...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
[[Category:Dam Breach Inundation Analysis]] | |||
---- | ---- | ||
<!-- Delete any sections that are not necessary to your topic. Add pictures/sections as needed --> | <!-- Delete any sections that are not necessary to your topic. Add pictures/sections as needed --> | ||
“The USDOI in its report [[Inundation Mapping]]/Modeling Subproject Report, Implementation Phase 1: Launch Risk Reduction, dated March 2011, recommends that as a general rule, larger dam breach flows, in terms of peak breach discharge and volume, do not require as detailed terrain data as would smaller flows. Smaller flood flow requires a more detailed definition of drainage paths, which creates a need for more accurate terrain data. | |||
“The USDOI in its report Inundation Mapping/Modeling Subproject Report, Implementation Phase 1: Launch Risk Reduction, dated March 2011, recommends that as a general rule, larger dam breach flows, in terms of peak breach discharge and volume, do not require as detailed terrain data as would smaller flows. Smaller flood flow requires a more detailed definition of drainage paths, which creates a need for more accurate terrain data. | |||
“Before performing an inundation study, available terrain sources should be carefully evaluated to identify the best-available data by considering numerous factors, including date, accuracy, and spatial extent of data to name a few. For instance, the selection of the level of detail and accuracy of the terrain data to be used for a dam breach study should consider the level of detail of the hydrologic and hydraulic modeling used for the study. A tier 1 simple and basic study, described in section 6.3 of this guidance document, covering a rural area does not warrant the same level of detailed terrain data as tier 2 intermediate or tier 3 advanced studies for heavily populated areas. Section 9 provides further discussion on terrain data and cross-section accuracy for use in dam breach studies. | “Before performing an inundation study, available terrain sources should be carefully evaluated to identify the best-available data by considering numerous factors, including date, accuracy, and spatial extent of data to name a few. For instance, the selection of the level of detail and accuracy of the terrain data to be used for a dam breach study should consider the level of detail of the hydrologic and hydraulic modeling used for the study. A tier 1 simple and basic study, described in section 6.3 of this guidance document, covering a rural area does not warrant the same level of detailed terrain data as tier 2 intermediate or tier 3 advanced studies for heavily populated areas. Section 9 provides further discussion on terrain data and cross-section accuracy for use in dam breach studies. | ||
“To achieve a suitable level of accuracy, it may be necessary to combine multiple terrain datasets to ensure that either the best available or an acceptable accuracy terrain data source is utilized throughout the spatial extent of the inundation. When combining terrain datasets, edge matching must be carefully reviewed to ensure that no artificial walls or drops are inadvertently created during the merge. Combined datasets must also use consistent horizontal and vertical datum and units” <ref name ="FEMA P-946">[[Federal Guidelines for Inundation Mapping of Flood Risks Associated with Dam Incidents and Failures (FEMA P-946) | | “To achieve a suitable level of accuracy, it may be necessary to combine multiple terrain datasets to ensure that either the best available or an acceptable accuracy terrain data source is utilized throughout the spatial extent of the inundation. When combining terrain datasets, edge matching must be carefully reviewed to ensure that no artificial walls or drops are inadvertently created during the merge. Combined datasets must also use consistent horizontal and vertical datum and units” <ref name ="FEMA P-946">[[Federal Guidelines for Inundation Mapping of Flood Risks Associated with Dam Incidents and Failures (FEMA P-946) | Federal Guidelines for Inundation Mapping of Flood Risks Associated with Dam Incidents and Failures (FEMA P-946), FEMA, 2013]]</ref>. | ||
==Best Practices Resources== | ==Best Practices Resources== | ||
{{Document Icon}} | {{Document Icon}} [[Federal Guidelines for Inundation Mapping of Flood Risks Associated with Dam Incidents and Failures (FEMA P-946) | Federal Guidelines for Inundation Mapping of Flood Risks Associated with Dam Incidents and Failures (FEMA P-946), FEMA]] | ||
<!-- For information on notation for in text citations visit https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Cite Or simply enclose the citation as shown <ref> citation </ref> in the location of the in text mention. Citations will automatically populate below--> | <!-- For information on notation for in text citations visit https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Cite Or simply enclose the citation as shown <ref> citation </ref> in the location of the in text mention. Citations will automatically populate below--> | ||
Latest revision as of 19:05, 11 July 2023
“The USDOI in its report Inundation Mapping/Modeling Subproject Report, Implementation Phase 1: Launch Risk Reduction, dated March 2011, recommends that as a general rule, larger dam breach flows, in terms of peak breach discharge and volume, do not require as detailed terrain data as would smaller flows. Smaller flood flow requires a more detailed definition of drainage paths, which creates a need for more accurate terrain data.
“Before performing an inundation study, available terrain sources should be carefully evaluated to identify the best-available data by considering numerous factors, including date, accuracy, and spatial extent of data to name a few. For instance, the selection of the level of detail and accuracy of the terrain data to be used for a dam breach study should consider the level of detail of the hydrologic and hydraulic modeling used for the study. A tier 1 simple and basic study, described in section 6.3 of this guidance document, covering a rural area does not warrant the same level of detailed terrain data as tier 2 intermediate or tier 3 advanced studies for heavily populated areas. Section 9 provides further discussion on terrain data and cross-section accuracy for use in dam breach studies.
“To achieve a suitable level of accuracy, it may be necessary to combine multiple terrain datasets to ensure that either the best available or an acceptable accuracy terrain data source is utilized throughout the spatial extent of the inundation. When combining terrain datasets, edge matching must be carefully reviewed to ensure that no artificial walls or drops are inadvertently created during the merge. Combined datasets must also use consistent horizontal and vertical datum and units” [1].
Best Practices Resources
Citations:
Revision ID: 7122
Revision Date: 07/11/2023