Incremental Damage Analysis - Revision history

Mpollei@gfnet.com at 18:38, 21 July 2023

2023-07-21T18:38:35Z

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 [[Category:Dam Breach Inundation Analysis]]
 ----
 <!-- Delete any sections that are not necessary to your topic. Add pictures/sections as needed -->
 In some jurisdictions, the [[Inflow Design Flood]] (IDF) can be established using incremental damage analysis or an incremental hazard evaluation. In this analysis, "the IDF is determined through an iterative process known as an incremental hazard evaluation. In other words, to evaluate the incremental increase in consequences due to dam failure, the evaluation begins with the normal full [[Reservoir Level|reservoir level]] with normal stream flow conditions prevailing. That condition should be routed through the dam and downstream areas, with the assumption that the dam remains in place. The same flow should then be routed through the dam with the assumption that the dam fails. The incremental increase in downstream water surface elevation between the with-failure and without-failure conditions should then be determined (in other words, how much higher would the water downstream be if the dam failed than if the dam did not fail?). The amount of damage that could result should then be identified. If the incremental rise in flood water downstream indicates an additional threat to downstream life and/or property, assess the need for remedial action." <ref name ="CH2">[[Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams| Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams, FERC, 2015]]</ref>.

Mpollei@gfnet.com at 19:10, 11 July 2023

2023-07-11T19:10:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:10, 11 July 2023
Line 10:		Line 10:

	==Best Practices Resources==		==Best Practices Resources==
	{{Document Icon}} [[Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams\|Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams, FERC~~, 2015~~]]		{{Document Icon}} [[Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams\|Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams, FERC]]

	<!-- For information on notation for in text citations visit https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Cite Or simply enclose the citation as shown <ref> citation </ref> in the location of the in text mention. Citations will automatically populate below-->		<!-- For information on notation for in text citations visit https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Cite Or simply enclose the citation as shown <ref> citation </ref> in the location of the in text mention. Citations will automatically populate below-->

Rmanwaring at 22:13, 19 December 2022

2022-12-19T22:13:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:13, 19 December 2022
Line 5:		Line 5:
	In some jurisdictions, the [[Inflow Design Flood]] (IDF) can be established using incremental damage analysis or an incremental hazard evaluation. In this analysis, "the IDF is determined through an iterative process known as an incremental hazard evaluation. In other words, to evaluate the incremental increase in consequences due to dam failure, the evaluation begins with the normal full [[Reservoir Level\|reservoir level]] with normal stream flow conditions prevailing. That condition should be routed through the dam and downstream areas, with the assumption that the dam remains in place. The same flow should then be routed through the dam with the assumption that the dam fails. The incremental increase in downstream water surface elevation between the with-failure and without-failure conditions should then be determined (in other words, how much higher would the water downstream be if the dam failed than if the dam did not fail?). The amount of damage that could result should then be identified. If the incremental rise in flood water downstream indicates an additional threat to downstream life and/or property, assess the need for remedial action." <ref name ="CH2">[[Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams\| Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams, FERC, 2015]]</ref>.		In some jurisdictions, the [[Inflow Design Flood]] (IDF) can be established using incremental damage analysis or an incremental hazard evaluation. In this analysis, "the IDF is determined through an iterative process known as an incremental hazard evaluation. In other words, to evaluate the incremental increase in consequences due to dam failure, the evaluation begins with the normal full [[Reservoir Level\|reservoir level]] with normal stream flow conditions prevailing. That condition should be routed through the dam and downstream areas, with the assumption that the dam remains in place. The same flow should then be routed through the dam with the assumption that the dam fails. The incremental increase in downstream water surface elevation between the with-failure and without-failure conditions should then be determined (in other words, how much higher would the water downstream be if the dam failed than if the dam did not fail?). The amount of damage that could result should then be identified. If the incremental rise in flood water downstream indicates an additional threat to downstream life and/or property, assess the need for remedial action." <ref name ="CH2">[[Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams\| Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams, FERC, 2015]]</ref>.

	"If the study under normal flow conditions indicates no adverse consequences, the same analyses should be done for several larger flood flows to determine the greatest unacceptable threat to downstream life and/or property. Under each incrementally larger inflow condition, identify the consequences of failure. For each larger assumed flood inflow condition (which can be percentages of the PMF): 1)assume the dam remains in place during the non-failure conditions, and 2) assume the dam fails when the peak reservoir elevation is attained for the assumed inflow condition." <ref name ="CH2"/>		"If the study under [[Normal Flow Conditions\|normal flow conditions]] indicates no adverse consequences, the same analyses should be done for several larger flood flows to determine the greatest unacceptable threat to downstream life and/or property. Under each incrementally larger inflow condition, identify the consequences of failure. For each larger assumed flood inflow condition (which can be percentages of the PMF): 1)assume the dam remains in place during the non-failure conditions, and 2) assume the dam fails when the peak reservoir elevation is attained for the assumed inflow condition." <ref name ="CH2"/>

	"The above procedure should be repeated until the flood inflow condition is identified such that a failure at that flow or larger flows (up to the PMF) will no longer result in an additional hazard to downstream life and/or property. The resultant flood flow is the IDF for the project. The maximum IDF is always the PMF, but in many cases the IDF will be substantially less than the PMF. It is important to investigate the full range of flood flow conditions to verify that a failure under flood flows larger than the selected IDF up through the PMF will not result in any additional hazard. In addition, once the design for remedial repairs is selected, the IDF should be verified for that design." <ref name ="CH2"/>		"The above procedure should be repeated until the flood inflow condition is identified such that a failure at that flow or larger flows (up to the PMF) will no longer result in an additional hazard to downstream life and/or property. The resultant flood flow is the IDF for the project. The maximum IDF is always the PMF, but in many cases the IDF will be substantially less than the PMF. It is important to investigate the full range of flood flow conditions to verify that a failure under flood flows larger than the selected IDF up through the PMF will not result in any additional hazard. In addition, once the design for remedial repairs is selected, the IDF should be verified for that design." <ref name ="CH2"/>

	==Best Practices Resources==		==Best Practices Resources==
	{{Document Icon}} [[Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams\|Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams ~~(Federal Energy Regulatory Commission)~~]]		{{Document Icon}} [[Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams\|Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams, FERC, 2015]]

	<!-- For information on notation for in text citations visit https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Cite Or simply enclose the citation as shown <ref> citation </ref> in the location of the in text mention. Citations will automatically populate below-->		<!-- For information on notation for in text citations visit https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Cite Or simply enclose the citation as shown <ref> citation </ref> in the location of the in text mention. Citations will automatically populate below-->

Grichards at 05:11, 18 November 2022

2022-11-18T05:11:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:11, 18 November 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	__NOTOC__		__NOTOC__
			[[Category:Dam Breach Inundation Analysis]]
	----		----
	<!-- Delete any sections that are not necessary to your topic. Add pictures/sections as needed -->		<!-- Delete any sections that are not necessary to your topic. Add pictures/sections as needed -->
	In some jurisdictions, the Inflow Design Flood (IDF) can be established using incremental damage analysis or an incremental hazard evaluation. In this analysis, "the IDF is determined through an iterative process known as an incremental hazard evaluation. In other words, to evaluate the incremental increase in consequences due to dam failure, the evaluation begins with the normal full reservoir level with normal stream flow conditions prevailing. That condition should be routed through the dam and downstream areas, with the assumption that the dam remains in place. The same flow should then be routed through the dam with the assumption that the dam fails. The incremental increase in downstream water surface elevation between the with-failure and without-failure conditions should then be determined (in other words, how much higher would the water downstream be if the dam failed than if the dam did not fail?). The amount of damage that could result should then be identified. If the incremental rise in flood water downstream indicates an additional threat to downstream life and/or property, assess the need for remedial action." <ref name ="CH2">[[Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams\| Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams, FERC, 2015]]</ref>.		In some jurisdictions, the [[Inflow Design Flood]] (IDF) can be established using incremental damage analysis or an incremental hazard evaluation. In this analysis, "the IDF is determined through an iterative process known as an incremental hazard evaluation. In other words, to evaluate the incremental increase in consequences due to dam failure, the evaluation begins with the normal full [[Reservoir Level\|reservoir level]] with normal stream flow conditions prevailing. That condition should be routed through the dam and downstream areas, with the assumption that the dam remains in place. The same flow should then be routed through the dam with the assumption that the dam fails. The incremental increase in downstream water surface elevation between the with-failure and without-failure conditions should then be determined (in other words, how much higher would the water downstream be if the dam failed than if the dam did not fail?). The amount of damage that could result should then be identified. If the incremental rise in flood water downstream indicates an additional threat to downstream life and/or property, assess the need for remedial action." <ref name ="CH2">[[Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams\| Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams, FERC, 2015]]</ref>.

	"If the study under normal flow conditions indicates no adverse consequences, the same analyses should be done for several larger flood flows to determine the greatest unacceptable threat to downstream life and/or property. Under each incrementally larger inflow condition, identify the consequences of failure. For each larger assumed flood inflow condition (which can be percentages of the PMF): 1)assume the dam remains in place during the non-failure conditions, and 2) assume the dam fails when the peak reservoir elevation is attained for the assumed inflow condition." <ref name ="CH2"/>		"If the study under normal flow conditions indicates no adverse consequences, the same analyses should be done for several larger flood flows to determine the greatest unacceptable threat to downstream life and/or property. Under each incrementally larger inflow condition, identify the consequences of failure. For each larger assumed flood inflow condition (which can be percentages of the PMF): 1)assume the dam remains in place during the non-failure conditions, and 2) assume the dam fails when the peak reservoir elevation is attained for the assumed inflow condition." <ref name ="CH2"/>

Grichards at 04:44, 17 September 2022

2022-09-17T04:44:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:44, 17 September 2022
Line 4:		Line 4:
	In some jurisdictions, the Inflow Design Flood (IDF) can be established using incremental damage analysis or an incremental hazard evaluation. In this analysis, "the IDF is determined through an iterative process known as an incremental hazard evaluation. In other words, to evaluate the incremental increase in consequences due to dam failure, the evaluation begins with the normal full reservoir level with normal stream flow conditions prevailing. That condition should be routed through the dam and downstream areas, with the assumption that the dam remains in place. The same flow should then be routed through the dam with the assumption that the dam fails. The incremental increase in downstream water surface elevation between the with-failure and without-failure conditions should then be determined (in other words, how much higher would the water downstream be if the dam failed than if the dam did not fail?). The amount of damage that could result should then be identified. If the incremental rise in flood water downstream indicates an additional threat to downstream life and/or property, assess the need for remedial action." <ref name ="CH2">[[Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams\| Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams, FERC, 2015]]</ref>.		In some jurisdictions, the Inflow Design Flood (IDF) can be established using incremental damage analysis or an incremental hazard evaluation. In this analysis, "the IDF is determined through an iterative process known as an incremental hazard evaluation. In other words, to evaluate the incremental increase in consequences due to dam failure, the evaluation begins with the normal full reservoir level with normal stream flow conditions prevailing. That condition should be routed through the dam and downstream areas, with the assumption that the dam remains in place. The same flow should then be routed through the dam with the assumption that the dam fails. The incremental increase in downstream water surface elevation between the with-failure and without-failure conditions should then be determined (in other words, how much higher would the water downstream be if the dam failed than if the dam did not fail?). The amount of damage that could result should then be identified. If the incremental rise in flood water downstream indicates an additional threat to downstream life and/or property, assess the need for remedial action." <ref name ="CH2">[[Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams\| Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams, FERC, 2015]]</ref>.

	"If the study under normal flow conditions indicates no adverse consequences, the same analyses should be done for several larger flood flows to determine the greatest unacceptable threat to downstream life and/or property. Under each incrementally larger inflow condition, identify the consequences of failure. For each larger assumed flood inflow condition (which can be percentages of the PMF):		"If the study under normal flow conditions indicates no adverse consequences, the same analyses should be done for several larger flood flows to determine the greatest unacceptable threat to downstream life and/or property. Under each incrementally larger inflow condition, identify the consequences of failure. For each larger assumed flood inflow condition (which can be percentages of the PMF): 1)assume the dam remains in place during the non-failure conditions, and 2) assume the dam fails when the peak reservoir elevation is attained for the assumed inflow condition." <ref name ="CH2"/>
	* assume the dam remains in place during the non-failure conditions, and
	* assume the dam fails when the peak reservoir elevation is attained for the assumed inflow condition." <ref name ="CH2"/>

	"The above procedure should be repeated until the flood inflow condition is identified such that a failure at that flow or larger flows (up to the PMF) will no longer result in an additional hazard to downstream life and/or property. The resultant flood flow is the IDF for the project. The maximum IDF is always the PMF, but in many cases the IDF will be substantially less than the PMF. It is important to investigate the full range of flood flow conditions to verify that a failure under flood flows larger than the selected IDF up through the PMF will not result in any additional hazard. In addition, once the design for remedial repairs is selected, the IDF should be verified for that design." <ref name ="CH2"/>		"The above procedure should be repeated until the flood inflow condition is identified such that a failure at that flow or larger flows (up to the PMF) will no longer result in an additional hazard to downstream life and/or property. The resultant flood flow is the IDF for the project. The maximum IDF is always the PMF, but in many cases the IDF will be substantially less than the PMF. It is important to investigate the full range of flood flow conditions to verify that a failure under flood flows larger than the selected IDF up through the PMF will not result in any additional hazard. In addition, once the design for remedial repairs is selected, the IDF should be verified for that design." <ref name ="CH2"/>

Grichards at 04:44, 17 September 2022

2022-09-17T04:44:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:44, 17 September 2022
Line 2:		Line 2:
	----		----
	<!-- Delete any sections that are not necessary to your topic. Add pictures/sections as needed -->		<!-- Delete any sections that are not necessary to your topic. Add pictures/sections as needed -->
	~~“Incremental: Under~~ the ~~same conditions~~ (e.g.~~, flood, earthquake, or~~ other ~~event)~~, the ~~difference~~ in ~~impacts that would occur~~ due to failure ~~or mis-operation of~~ the dam ~~over those~~ that ~~would have occurred~~ without failure ~~or mis-operation~~ of the ~~dam~~ and ~~appurtenances”~~ <ref name ="~~FEMA P-333~~">[[~~Federal~~ Guidelines for ~~Dam Safety~~: ~~Hazard Potential Classification System~~ for Dams ~~(FEMA P-333)~~\| ~~FEMA P-333 Federal~~ Guidelines for ~~Dam Safety~~: ~~Hazard Potential Classification System~~ for Dams, ~~FEMA~~, ~~2004~~]]</ref>.		In some jurisdictions, the Inflow Design Flood (IDF) can be established using incremental damage analysis or an incremental hazard evaluation. In this analysis, "the IDF is determined through an iterative process known as an incremental hazard evaluation. In other words, to evaluate the incremental increase in consequences due to dam failure, the evaluation begins with the normal full reservoir level with normal stream flow conditions prevailing. That condition should be routed through the dam and downstream areas, with the assumption that the dam remains in place. The same flow should then be routed through the dam with the assumption that the dam fails. The incremental increase in downstream water surface elevation between the with-failure and without-failure conditions should then be determined (in other words, how much higher would the water downstream be if the dam failed than if the dam did not fail?). The amount of damage that could result should then be identified. If the incremental rise in flood water downstream indicates an additional threat to downstream life and/or property, assess the need for remedial action." <ref name ="CH2">[[Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams\| Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams, FERC, 2015]]</ref>.

	~~“It~~ should be ~~understood that~~ the ~~‘hazard potential’ is~~ the ~~possible adverse incremental~~ consequences ~~that result from the release~~ of ~~water or stored contents due to~~ failure ~~or misoperation~~ of the dam. ~~Incremental consequences are defined as~~ the ~~impacts~~ that ~~would occur due to~~ failure or ~~misoperation of~~ the ~~dam over those that would have occurred without failure~~ or ~~misoperation of~~ the ~~dam~~. The ~~hazard potential assigned~~ to ~~a dam is based on consideration of~~ the ~~incremental adverse effects~~ of ~~failure during both normal and~~ flood flow conditions. ~~Hazard potential does not indicate~~ the ~~structural integrity of the dam itself~~, ~~but rather~~ the ~~consequences~~ should ~~dam failure occur”~~. <ref name ="~~FEMA P-94~~"~~>[[Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams (FEMA P-94)\| FEMA P-94 Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams, FEMA, 2013]]<~~/~~ref~~>.		"If the study under normal flow conditions indicates no adverse consequences, the same analyses should be done for several larger flood flows to determine the greatest unacceptable threat to downstream life and/or property. Under each incrementally larger inflow condition, identify the consequences of failure. For each larger assumed flood inflow condition (which can be percentages of the PMF):
			* assume the dam remains in place during the non-failure conditions, and
			* assume the dam fails when the peak reservoir elevation is attained for the assumed inflow condition." <ref name ="CH2"/>

			"The above procedure should be repeated until the flood inflow condition is identified such that a failure at that flow or larger flows (up to the PMF) will no longer result in an additional hazard to downstream life and/or property. The resultant flood flow is the IDF for the project. The maximum IDF is always the PMF, but in many cases the IDF will be substantially less than the PMF. It is important to investigate the full range of flood flow conditions to verify that a failure under flood flows larger than the selected IDF up through the PMF will not result in any additional hazard. In addition, once the design for remedial repairs is selected, the IDF should be verified for that design." <ref name ="CH2"/>

	~~==Examples==~~
	~~{{Website Icon}}~~
	==Best Practices Resources==		==Best Practices Resources==
	{{Document Icon}} [[~~Federal~~ Guidelines for ~~Dam Safety~~: ~~Hazard Potential Classification System~~ for Dams ~~(FEMA P~~-~~333)]]~~		{{Document Icon}} [[Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams\|Engineering Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hydropower Projects: Chapter 2- Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission)]]
	~~{{Document Icon}} [[~~Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams (~~FEMA P-94~~)]]
	~~==Trainings==~~
	~~{{Video Icon}}~~

	<!-- For information on notation for in text citations visit https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Cite Or simply enclose the citation as shown <ref> citation </ref> in the location of the in text mention. Citations will automatically populate below-->		<!-- For information on notation for in text citations visit https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Cite Or simply enclose the citation as shown <ref> citation </ref> in the location of the in text mention. Citations will automatically populate below-->

Cort at 20:23, 13 September 2022

2022-09-13T20:23:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:23, 13 September 2022
Line 9:		Line 9:
	{{Website Icon}}		{{Website Icon}}
	==Best Practices Resources==		==Best Practices Resources==
	{{Document Icon}}		{{Document Icon}} [[Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety: Hazard Potential Classification System for Dams (FEMA P-333)]]
			{{Document Icon}} [[Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams (FEMA P-94)]]
	==Trainings==		==Trainings==
	{{Video Icon}}		{{Video Icon}}

Cort: Cort moved page Incremental Damaga Analysis to Incremental Damage Analysis: Typo in title

2022-09-13T14:20:06Z

Cort moved page Incremental Damaga Analysis to Incremental Damage Analysis: Typo in title

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:20, 13 September 2022
(No difference)

Cort: Created page with "NOTOC ---- “Incremental: Under the same conditions (e.g., flood, earthquake, or other event), the difference in impacts that would occur due to failure or mis-operation of the dam over those that would have occurred without failure or mis-operation of the dam and appurtenances” Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety: Hazard Potential Classificat..."

2022-09-12T19:30:24Z

Created page with "__NOTOC__ ----  “Incremental: Under the same conditions (e.g., flood, earthquake, or other event), the difference in impacts that would occur due to failure or mis-operation of the dam over those that would have occurred without failure or mis-operation of the dam and appurtenances” <ref name ="FEMA P-333">Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety: Hazard Potential Classificat..."

New page

__NOTOC__
----

“Incremental: Under the same conditions (e.g., flood, earthquake, or other event), the difference in impacts that would occur due to failure or mis-operation of the dam over those that would have occurred without failure or mis-operation of the dam and appurtenances” <ref name ="FEMA P-333">[[Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety: Hazard Potential Classification System for Dams (FEMA P-333)| FEMA P-333 Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety: Hazard Potential Classification System for Dams, FEMA, 2004]]</ref>.

“It should be understood that the ‘hazard potential’ is the possible adverse incremental consequences that result from the release of water or stored contents due to failure or misoperation of the dam. Incremental consequences are defined as the impacts that would occur due to failure or misoperation of the dam over those that would have occurred without failure or misoperation of the dam. The hazard potential assigned to a dam is based on consideration of the incremental adverse effects of failure during both normal and flood flow conditions. Hazard potential does not indicate the structural integrity of the dam itself, but rather the consequences should dam failure occur”. <ref name ="FEMA P-94">[[Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams (FEMA P-94)| FEMA P-94 Selecting and Accommodating Inflow Design Floods for Dams, FEMA, 2013]]</ref>.

==Examples==
{{Website Icon}}
==Best Practices Resources==
{{Document Icon}}
==Trainings==
{{Video Icon}}


{{Citations}}


{{revhistinf}}